YouTube removes two videos from a U.S. Senate committee

Re:YouTube removes two videos from a U.S. Senate committee by adamredwoods on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @03:42PM (#26006348)

How thoroughly are 'opinion' articles vetted? Not at all? Why are they considered substantial then.

> Dr. Kory asked the National Institutes of Health to review his group’s manuscript outlining dozens of successful trials and to consider updating its Aug. 27 guidance in which it recommended “against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19, except in a clinical trial.” On Dec. 10, Sen. Rand Paul and I sent a letter to the NIH requesting that it review Dr. Kory’s evidence.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7521351/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube removes two videos from a U.S. Senate committee by gltchkrft on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @03:52PM (#26006476)

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-the...

Last Updated: August 27, 2020

The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial (AIII).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube removes two videos from a U.S. Senate committee by m-p-3 on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @12:59AM (#26011011)

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/statement-on-...

Last Updated: January 14, 2021

> The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) has determined that currently there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.

And I agree, we need more data before moving forward.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube removes two videos from a U.S. Senate committee by gltchkrft on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:15PM (#26021404)

Yes. That was after the senate testimony session, that youtube removed. At the time of that senate testimony, this was the recommendation.

[ Parent | on HN ]