News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by jgalt212 on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:42AM (#26001460)
Well, religion is a based on faith.

What is the basis of atheism? Is it evidence based? Is is gut feeling based? What the general or most commonly cited bases of the validity of atheism by atheists?

Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by soylentcola on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:55AM (#26001617)
The way I've always seen it is that lack of belief in something doesn't really demand evidence. How would one prove that they don't believe in something?

At least from my (personal) perspective, the lack of belief in gods stems from not having found or experienced sufficient reason to think there likely are gods. It's not that I'm claiming to know or believe that there are certainly not any gods out there in the universe. I just can't find anything to back up the claim that there are.

Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by jgalt212 on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:04AM (#26001719)
> that lack of belief in something

But isn't that more agnosticism that atheism?

Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by soylentcola on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:14AM (#26001844)
It's probably a matter of semantics, but in my experience and usage, "theism" is belief in a deity/deities. "a- theism" is lack of belief in such, much in the way asexual reproduction is reproduction without the use of sex rather than "at odds with" the use of sex.

Gnosticism and agnosticism refer to knowledge or lack thereof. If I cared to use labels, I'd classify myself as an agnostic atheist. I don't claim the certainty of knowledge that there couldn't be deities, but I don't personally believe there are any (at least not in the sense of ultra-powerful entities that have/had some sort of interaction with the doings of humanity).

Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by bitcharmer on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:13AM (#26001831)
You have it all wrong. Atheists don't have to provide evidence for anything. It's the religion that should offer proof supporting the existence of the absolute.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by Dirlewanger on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:32AM (#26002101)
"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence"
Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by mrkeen on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @10:25AM (#26002004)

    1) Either faith can be used in an argument, or it can't

      2) If it cannot, then it cannot.

      3) If it can, then I have faith that it cannot.

    4) 3 contradicts itself so we are left with its alternative 2.
Re:A Manual for Creating Atheists: A Critical Review (2014) by dimitrios1 on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @09:58AM (#26001650)
This is a good point. I went from cultural religious - agnostic - atheist - religious in my life. The thing I realized is it takes the same part of my inner being to believe the claims of Jesus Christ as it did to believe the claims of theorists make about things such as the origin of the universe, the GUT, macroevolution, the origin of consciousness, and so many other models of physics and evolutionary biology. It all requires faith in a certain viewpoint and model of the world from our standpoint.