Re:Food Grammar: Unspoken rules of cuisine
by curiousllama on Monday February 01, 2021 @04:58PM
(#25994605)
> That this thought experiment merits a web page is really quite astounding. That I decided to write you an e-mail telling you that is even more astounding. And that I don't drink myself stupid following this exchange will be the most astounding non-event in the history of mankind. I am baffled, shattered, and destroyed by the mind-numbing pointlessness of The Incompatible Food Triad experiment. It makes me ill. I promise you, sir, I will never again be the same after witnessing the sheer mind-blowing uselessness of that puzzle. My life as I know it, is over. I once was lost, but then I was found, and then I found your website linked to Wikipedia and now I am lost again, irretrievably lost in a dark maze, a pitch dark maze with the Minotaur of Bafflement hunting me down. I shall not escape him, I shall not escape my doom. No, good sir, instead I fall - far and away, even from myself I fall until I slam forcefully into the cold steel floor of my own mind, crippled and alone, dead to all sensation. I am gone, sir, and I shall never return.
Loved the page, myself.
Re:Food Grammar: Unspoken rules of cuisine
by klyrs on Monday February 01, 2021 @05:18PM
(#25994854)
Indeed, the pb/hotdog/banana experiment was performed with this problem in mind. Though, nobody thinks that banana and hotdog is worth considering... until you roast the banana... (and, yeah, still questionable)
Re:Food Grammar: Unspoken rules of cuisine
by babelfish on Monday February 01, 2021 @05:41PM
(#25995122)
This deserves it's own post
After twenty-five years of thinking about this problem I decided to write a web page about it. Here is the problem:
Can you find three foods such that all three do not go together (by any reasonable definition of foods "going together") but every pair of them does go together?
The page is extremely funny, but also serious - my favourite combination.
http://www.georgehart.com/triad.html