News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Counterfeiting Stock – Explaining illegal naked shorting ... by dragonwriter on Monday February 01, 2021 @10:23AM (#25989414)
> The price of anything is a result of its some intrinsic value and the volume of supply.

No, it's the result of supply and demand not supply and “intrinsic value”. Demand is driven by subjective value, not “intrinsic value” which is a nonsense concept that misunderstands fundamentally how value and human action relate.

Re:Counterfeiting Stock – Explaining illegal naked shorting ... by fennecfoxen on Monday February 01, 2021 @10:27AM (#25989448)
Demand for a stock is generally linked to the value of its future discounted cash flows, which is as close to a definition of "intrinsic value" as one can reasonably realize in the world.
Re:Counterfeiting Stock – Explaining illegal naked shorting ... by dragonwriter on Monday February 01, 2021 @01:56PM (#25992066)
> Demand for a stock is generally linked to the value of its future discounted cash flows

Tautologically so, in the sense that the market’s notional consensus of the expected future cash flow is inferred by those who are convinced of it's simplistic financial rationality from the stock price and assumptions of the proper discounting mechanism. Factually...that's a bit harder to argue.

There's some a-step-more distant proxies that people hold up as touchstones for that like P/E ratio, but those aren't consistent across stocks or, marketwide, over time.

Re:Counterfeiting Stock – Explaining illegal naked shorting ... by mint2 on Monday February 01, 2021 @11:21AM (#25989998)
Wrong, the P/E ratio dramatically increased this year.