I am not a native speaker; it can thus be assumed to be a combination of many different dialects. My pronunciation, however:
- features the trap–bath split
- is non-rhotic, has a fairly consistent linking-r, but no intrusive-r.
- ordinarily features the whine–wine merger, but does split them again in stressed interrogatives
- does not undergo flapping of alveolar stops
- ocasionally realizes fortis alveolar stops as glottal stops intervocallically, but never in a stressed context
- realizes fortis alveolar alveolar stops as affricativess before /u/ and /i/ in a stressed context, rather than as aspirates
- features l-vocalization in the coda of syllables
- features neither yod-dropping nor yod-coalescence such that “soot” “shoot” and “suit” are a minimal triplet
- fronts /ai/ to a realization of [ɑe̯]
I know of no actual English dialect that combines these features, as expected of a non-native speaker, with the exception of it's non-rhotic nature, it seems to gravitate towards a realization that mostly combines the different kdistinctions made in most dialects, assimilating splits, but not mergers.
Re:Wayland Keylogger
by Izkata on Saturday January 30, 2021 @06:14PM
(#25974005)
I'm guessing "præsented" is what caught GP's eye. I've never seen that before, was is supposed to be "presented" or is that how it would be spelled in your native language/dialect?
- features the trap–bath split
- is non-rhotic, has a fairly consistent linking-r, but no intrusive-r.
- ordinarily features the whine–wine merger, but does split them again in stressed interrogatives
- does not undergo flapping of alveolar stops
- ocasionally realizes fortis alveolar stops as glottal stops intervocallically, but never in a stressed context
- realizes fortis alveolar alveolar stops as affricativess before /u/ and /i/ in a stressed context, rather than as aspirates
- features l-vocalization in the coda of syllables
- features neither yod-dropping nor yod-coalescence such that “soot” “shoot” and “suit” are a minimal triplet
- fronts /ai/ to a realization of [ɑe̯]
I know of no actual English dialect that combines these features, as expected of a non-native speaker, with the exception of it's non-rhotic nature, it seems to gravitate towards a realization that mostly combines the different kdistinctions made in most dialects, assimilating splits, but not mergers.