News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by vertis on Saturday January 30, 2021 @01:42PM (#25971657)
Yes, this[1] was the one that I found when searching. It shows that Robinhood is it's own, but as we know they route to Citadel.

A bunch of others had a problem when Apex Holdings told them to restrict trading (or something along those lines).

[1]: https://investorjunkie.com/stock-brokers/broker-clearing-fir...

Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by tptacek on Saturday January 30, 2021 @02:36PM (#25972194)
This subthread is confusing clearinghouses, clearing brokers, and execution brokers.

Citadel is an execution broker. Their job is to match buyers and sellers.

Apex (in these conversations) is a clearing broker. Robinhood is its own clearing broker. Clearing brokers are responsible for ensuring that money and stock actually changes hands (this takes 2 days, but all of these firms work together to create the illusion, using credit, that it's instant; those credit arrangements are why brokerages post collateral).

Clearing brokers are members of clearinghouses. The relevant one here is (I think) NSCC, which is owned by DTCC. Policy set at DTCC determines how much collateral needs to be posted to cover any particular set of trades.

DTCC drastically ratcheted up the amount of collateral required to cover trades in meme stocks, which had the effect of 10x'ing the amount of cash Robinhood was required to post to insure that it would not go out of business before its current set of in-flight trades cleared. It made the same requirement of Apex, which passed restrictions down to its customers. These companies are contractually required to make good on collateral requirements, so there isn't much choice involved.

Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by doanerock on Saturday January 30, 2021 @02:47PM (#25972298)
The problem is not the cleaning houses, this article explains it really good https://www.bloombergquint.com/markets/clearing-firms-preven... So there are couple of issues, one is the two day settlement, the other is increased capital requirements put in by DTCC.
Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by Daho0n on Saturday January 30, 2021 @01:50PM (#25971764)
How come it works from all the way over here in Scandinavia? No problems with GME while RH was shutting it down.

Also, Robin Hood - the irony. They are clearly for the rich against the poor. More like the sheriff of nottingham!

Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by gruez on Saturday January 30, 2021 @01:57PM (#25971833)
>How come it works from all the way over here in Scandinavia? No problems with GME while RH was shutting it down.

Maybe because there's already a high barrier to trading US stocks (or stocks in general), so there wasn't enough people piling on to strain the brokerage's balance sheets?

Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by egwor on Saturday January 30, 2021 @02:10PM (#25971953)
Agreed. Probably highly likely that few others using that broker were involved.
Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by jonp888 on Saturday January 30, 2021 @02:46PM (#25972291)
Just luck. Trade Republic, a Robin-hood-alike in Germany, also had to shut down GME purchases.
Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by capableweb on Saturday January 30, 2021 @02:41PM (#25972243)
I'm also in a European country and using my national bank for trading. In the end, my bank is using JP Morgan for NYSE trades, so in the end would be up to JP Morgan to block trades. But everything seems to have worked fine here all week.
Re:Analysis: Robinhood protected from lawsuits by user agree... by Gwypaas on Saturday January 30, 2021 @02:13PM (#25971990)
Because we buy stocks on the open market paying courtage for someone to execute the trade.