Example calculation: https://uploads.volkswagen-newsroom.com/system/production/up...
Here is a quite comprehensive analysis:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0488-7.epdf
Edit: you might have better luck with this link;
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0488-7.epdf?refer...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life-cycle_greenhouse_gas_emis...
I do like your emphasis on marginal effects. As renewables and BEVs grow it will be a balancing act to pick the most marginally effective resources for emissions abatement. California may soon reach a point where an additional dollar invested in solar doesn't abate as much CO2 as the same dollar invested in transmission, storage, or wind -- even if solar has the lowest instantaneous generation cost.
Is this generally true, or does it depend on geography (e.g. being near the coast)? Where I am in the midwest, it seems that the air normally gets very calm after sunset.
"The Relationship between Wind Generation and Balancing-Energy Market Prices in ERCOT: 2007–2009"
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49415.pdf
See Figure 5. Hourly generation reaches a minimum from about 1:00 to 5:00 PM and reaches its maximum around 1:00 AM.
Offshore wind output changes less from short term day-night cycles, and generally achieves a higher capacity factor. It is also more expensive to build than onshore wind and no large projects have yet been built for the US, though several are on the drawing board.
Are they? Does that include the manufacturing process?