News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by ericpauley on Saturday January 30, 2021 @12:24PM (#25970910)
> The so-called mishap investigation

Who is calling it so? This practice of using "so-called" to manufacture unsubstantiated descriptions of events or people is poor journalism at best. See also a more notable and previously-critiqued use of this langauge: https://www.ft.com/content/ac7389f1-41d8-46b6-bc42-32ac603b7...

Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by babesh on Saturday January 30, 2021 @01:45PM (#25971711)
Let’s see how long this lasts.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by nibsfive on Saturday January 30, 2021 @08:20AM (#25968810)
It will be end times if the government can't get out of the way of progress.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by m463 on Saturday January 30, 2021 @08:27AM (#25968867)
They are also trying to reasonably protect us. (remember 737 max?)

Although spacex lost lots of rockets out on a floating barge far from populated areas, this is on land near humans and should not be easily normalized.

I think the chinese have had some rocket mishaps that were not good.

that said it's a hard line to walk.

Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by Schiendelman on Saturday January 30, 2021 @08:47AM (#25969026)
We don't have any evidence that there was any safety concern here; the FAA has not said that.

The FAA already admits that their existing license system doesn't work properly for reusable rockets, and they're long delayed implementing their new license system. I don't think we should assume they're in the right here.

Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by dd_roger on Saturday January 30, 2021 @09:26AM (#25969311)
> We don't have any evidence that there was any safety concern here; the FAA has not said that.

That this particular violation didn't lead to any incident doesn't invalidate the need for licenses and the obligation to respect them.

"This particular instance of me driving 200 mph on a public road didn't result in any accident so no big deal right, speed limits are useless"

Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by jiofih on Saturday January 30, 2021 @10:27AM (#25969813)
What exactly was “this particular violation”? You’re knee-jerk reacting and missing the point - there is likely no actual concern other than fitting the mold of some decade old rules regarding once-a-year launches. Both parties are aware of that.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by jimrandomh on Saturday January 30, 2021 @12:48PM (#25971159)
SN8 hit the landing pad, which had a designated exclusion zone around it (a safety radius in which humans are not allowed). Crashing into the landing pad was a completely unsurprising result for the test they were doing, and I'm not aware of any reason to think that the exclusion zone was too small.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by tipsea on Saturday January 30, 2021 @08:45AM (#25969001)
Any idea how I could find text of the launch license? I tried googling but didn't have any luck.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by AbrahamParangi on Saturday January 30, 2021 @11:49AM (#25970588)
The 737 max is not exactly a shining example of the FAA doing a good job.
Re:SpaceX violated launch license in Starship test, triggeri... by aiscapehumanity on Saturday January 30, 2021 @10:19AM (#25969738)
The FAA knew in advan