Re:Police Say They Use Facial Recognition Despite Bans
by octostone on Friday January 29, 2021 @08:45AM
(#25957138)
They’re allowed to do that too
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Police Say They Use Facial Recognition Despite Bans
by netizen-9748 on Friday January 29, 2021 @09:35AM
(#25957598)
They're allowed to lie to suspects, not the courts where parallel construction happens. A defense attorney can't get evidence stricken when it came from dubious sources when they lie in court about the source.
Re:Police Say They Use Facial Recognition Despite Bans
by sneak on Friday January 29, 2021 @10:02AM
(#25957888)
> They're allowed to lie to suspects, not the courts where parallel construction happens.
That's only true in theory. In practice, police lies are one of the pillars of the US "justice" system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_perjury
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/18/nyregion/testilying-polic...
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/08/police-testilyin...
Re:Police Say They Use Facial Recognition Despite Bans
by netizen-9748 on Friday January 29, 2021 @10:13AM
(#25958014)
That is exactly the problem
Re:Police Say They Use Facial Recognition Despite Bans
by voxic11 on Friday January 29, 2021 @10:39AM
(#25958340)
> The two senior DEA officials, who spoke on behalf of the agency but only on condition of anonymity, said the process is kept secret to protect sources and investigative methods. "Parallel construction is a law enforcement technique we use every day," one official said. "It's decades old, a bedrock concept."
https://web.archive.org/web/20130809014315/https://www.reute...
Re:Police Say They Use Facial Recognition Despite Bans
by kwhitefoot on Friday January 29, 2021 @11:26AM
(#25959017)
A lot of the comments in this discussion should be tagged with the country to which they apply.