News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Robinhood by girvo on Thursday January 28, 2021 @05:48PM (#25950639)
You keep posting this in every possible thread.

Question: who got punished for the VW short squeeze? That was illegal too, right?

The thing is, I think I know what you’re trying to say, but you’re not explaining it well enough, and are spreading (at best) misinformation.

A short squeeze isn’t illegal.

Organising a coordinated one might be.

Re:Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Robinhood by drail99 on Thursday January 28, 2021 @06:15PM (#25950906)
The VW wasn't a planned squeeze. It just happened because Porsche was actively taking a stake in the company. Porsche didn't buy the stock with the intention of selling it to make a profit, they literally tried to buy the company to trigger a asset transfer clause.

It's also worth nothing that this happened in Germany so not subject to SEC regulations AND very importantly, Porsche actually ended up on the losing end of the deal and getting screwed. They tried to get a Bail out from the Saudi's but German govt. Wouldn't allow it.

In the US, buying stocks with the intention of creating a short squeeze and then reselling the stock is expressively illegal by SEC regulations, it's why you see the phrase "WE like the stock" so much.

Re:Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Robinhood by llampx on Thursday January 28, 2021 @05:40PM (#25950524)
Short squeezes are not illegal, stop spreading misinformation.
Re:Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Robinhood by zionic on Thursday January 28, 2021 @05:39PM (#25950509)
> a short squeeze is illegal

No it's not

Re:Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Robinhood by Noted on Thursday January 28, 2021 @05:48PM (#25950631)
You keep posting this, but do you have any evidence? Other people have repeatedly refuted short squeezes being illegal.