Re:OO in Python is mostly pointless
by dragonwriter on Thursday January 28, 2021 @03:35PM
(#25948750)
> My problem with these arguments is that its meaningless, if this "bad OO" (or "bad <insert paradigm>") is what most developers write.
Only if that's more true than “bad <foo> is what most developers write in paradigm <foo>” where <foo> is the presented alternative paradigm, otherwise we’re comparing the platonic ideal of <foo> against real world OO.
Sturgeon’s Law may not be quantitatively precise, but it addresses a real qualitative issue that must be considered.
Only if that's more true than “bad <foo> is what most developers write in paradigm <foo>” where <foo> is the presented alternative paradigm, otherwise we’re comparing the platonic ideal of <foo> against real world OO.
Sturgeon’s Law may not be quantitatively precise, but it addresses a real qualitative issue that must be considered.