News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by mancerayder on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:08AM (#25942873)
I'm saying they should be sued. So, yes, I am saying that. If you buy securities you can't sell, you're pinned and that's not right, is it. I'm not sure if Robinhood traders signed up to that. Free doesn't matter.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by lkramer on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:10AM (#25942929)
They still allow selling, just not buying.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by abootstrapper on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:23AM (#25943162)
Allowing only buying OR selling seems like a good lever to manipulate a stock price.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by pureliquidhw on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:30AM (#25943324)
But who's buying if you can't buy? Limiting the audience that can buy reduces demand, and thus the price will be negatively impacted.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by castlecrasher2 on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:45AM (#25943629)
To me that suggests they're kowtowing to short sellers and manipulating the market.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by maxwell on Thursday January 28, 2021 @11:03AM (#25943954)
Nah. "You can only sell up to 0 shares of GME."