News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by swiley on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:04AM (#25942814)
Oh well that's reasonable. If I were a brokerage you bet your ass I wouldn't lend you money to buy GME.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by aynyc on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:18AM (#25943065)
Why should broker allow margin trading at all? If it's about risk, then who's the decider/calculator of the risk? I think this is the reason why there is a distrust from the next generation.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by swiley on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:20AM (#25943096)
This really wouldn't be the first time Robinhood changed their software to prevent it's users from doing exceptionally stupid things with margin.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by JumpCrisscross on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:21AM (#25943114)
> who's the decider/calculator of the risk?

The lender. As in all loans. As is in every detail described in one’s margin contract.

Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by aynyc on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:34AM (#25943415)
I looked at my margin document, other than Federal Reserve requirements and account restriction, there is no provision stating they can block a specific eligible stock as long as I meet their margin requirement.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by JumpCrisscross on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:59AM (#25943885)
> there is no provision stating they can block a specific eligible stock as long as I meet their margin requirement

That may explain why they had to block trading in the stock. Margin losses almost inevitable at this point. But legal said they couldn't block lending on a single name. Their TOS, however, permit them to suspend trading in single names.

Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by aynyc on Thursday January 28, 2021 @11:02AM (#25943940)
Ah, that actually make sense. I don't see how RH allows sell, but not buy. That's just insanely corrupt because it clearly manipulates the market.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by kgwgk on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:51AM (#25943750)
Their margin requirement may be linked to the name so increasing the margin requirement to 100% would be a way to block the use of margin.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by aynyc on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:58AM (#25943868)
That would block all margin trades, no? Not a specific instrument. I understand why they did it, but it leaves a very bad taste in my mouth.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by kgwgk on Thursday January 28, 2021 @11:02AM (#25943927)
They can set margin requirement separately for each stock.

For example, with InteractiveBrokers "long stock positions [of AMC, BB, EXPR, GME, and KOSS] will require 100% margin and short stock positions will require 300% margin until further notice".

https://twitter.com/IBKR/status/1354792600004386818

Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by aynyc on Thursday January 28, 2021 @11:10AM (#25944068)
I get that part, but why would 100% margin on buys eliminate the buys? If I have $100K cash, I can still buy $50K of XXX and meet the margin requirement. They are blocking buys, but not sells.
Re:WallStreetBets vs WallStreet: It's not about the money an... by kgwgk on Thursday January 28, 2021 @11:15AM (#25944164)
Who is blocking buys?

The context of this subthread is this message https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25942677 about brokers allowing the buying of GME but not on margin (and how they don't have to disallow the use of margin for every stock for that).