News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open-source, not open-contribution by toyg on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:04AM (#25942808)
The whole business model of GitHub is to get you to use its proprietary social features, so that 1) you get locked-in, and 2) you generate and maintain adoption virality.

The minute they become just another dumb git host, their relevance disappears.

Re:Open-source, not open-contribution by sofixa on Friday January 29, 2021 @12:36PM (#25959953)
> 1) you get locked-in,

How do you get locked in? PRs, once merged, are just regular commits. You lose the history and discussion around the PR itself, but that's all, but it's not like any alternative allows you to migrate ( e.g. the abomination that is using email for git collaboration is stuck in unreadable, unsearchable, unindexed emails somewhere; you can copy the data pretty much the same way as from GitHub, but both are unexploitable without a lot of tinkering / adaptation)