News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Exploring the nature of genius by slothtrop on Thursday January 28, 2021 @09:01AM (#25941813)
Does it have to mean that?
Re:Exploring the nature of genius by wenc on Thursday January 28, 2021 @10:58AM (#25943867)
John von Neumann, a genius if there ever was one, was apparently a hoot.

"Von Neumann is remembered as a man of warm personality: courteous, charming, and jovial, with an often ribald, sometimes wry, sense of humor that made him excellent company and gained him a reputation as a bon vivant. He was fond of limericks and practical jokes and hosted frequent Princeton parties. He was also well known as a reckless driver, once emerging, so the story goes, from a smashed car with the explanation: "I was proceeding down the road. The trees on the right were passing me in orderly fashion at 60 MPH. Suddenly, one of them stepped out in my path. Boom!""

https://www.ias.edu/von-neumann

Re:Exploring the nature of genius by randcraw on Thursday January 28, 2021 @09:58AM (#25942682)
I suppose the answer to that is whether some 'geniuses' also are known for treating others well. As I recall, Shannon was described as a nice guy who seemed to care about others or at least respected their feelings. Perhaps technical genuises are better about this than artistic geniuses?

I suspect the majority of genuii are self absorbed. Certainly that aspect of (mis)behavior is a mainstay of the genius stereotype. Or maybe that portrayal in movies is just the conceit of lazy scriptwriters...