Most pro-censorship voices motte-and-bailey the latter by conflating it with the former.
They did not give it without terms of usage so your point is mute.
Let's start with the basics. Forget the selective enforcement aspect and the lawyering over the definition of "censorship" - can anything a private company does with its private property ever be criticized?
Terms of service are not above criticism, did not say it and did not imply it. I don't understand how you came to think that considering that in your previous post there is no criticism of discords TOS.
I was simply replaying to your statement that: "Discord reacted to how the platform they had already given was being used.". I don't understand why anyone would think that the owner of the platform should not be able to dictate the terms of use of their platform or react if those terms are not followed.
Do you want to live like that?
Discord reacted to how the platform they had already given was being used. That's different, practically and morally, from NBC not giving them a TV show.