News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OO in Python is mostly pointless by rbanffy on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @06:23PM (#25935589)
Sorry. That's something that was true in 2.x but not anymore. There used to be UserString, UserList, UserDict classes for serving as base classes. We still have those, but, at least now, we can extend the fundamental classes directly.

They are a bit more convenient than the built-ins.

Re:OO in Python is mostly pointless by pansa2 on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @06:46PM (#25935799)
We can inherit from `list`, `dict` etc., but objects of those classes are still not as flexible as "normal" objects. For example, we can't add an attribute to a list using `l = []; l.a = 1`.
Re:OO in Python is mostly pointless by joshuamorton on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @07:06PM (#25936047)
I believe that makes them the same as any other class defined with `__slots__`:

    >>> class Foo:
    ...   __slots__ = ('a', 'b')
    ...
    >>> f = Foo()
    >>> f.a = 1
    >>> f.b = 2
    >>> f.c = 3
        Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
        AttributeError: 'Foo' object has no attribute 'c'