News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's the deal with Chromium on Linux? Google at odds wi... by eesmith on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @03:31PM (#25933532)
Support for 32-bit builds and native BSD builds? That's two factors mentioned in the linked-to Hackaday piece. Following the links also shows things like disabling "some of the more intrusive Google features."

Where did you get the idea that anyone thinks Google should be forced to support other browsers?

The Hackaday piece even says "Google is going to run their business as they see fit. If they think allowing unofficial builds of Chromium to tap into their cloud services such as Sync isn’t worth it, it’s their prerogative to block them."

The topic is more the annoyance that what had once been an official exception to the terms of service (which passed through legal and the VP level at Google) has not merely been rescinded, but treated as if it were never valid and its asserted mis-use "discovered" by an audit.

Re:What's the deal with Chromium on Linux? Google at odds wi... by tracker1 on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @05:06PM (#25934698)
More likely it's to keep down the likes of Brave and Opera than Chromium on Linux/BSD, which are probably barely a blip by comparison.

If MS were smart, they'd open up their alternatives to the Chromium community. They've done such a good job at building goodwill the past few years, and would be a nice gesture.

Re:What's the deal with Chromium on Linux? Google at odds wi... by eesmith on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @06:13PM (#25935470)
FWIW, the thread at https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/embedder-dev/c/NX... says:

> The Brave project has built a Sync server for their Chromium-based Brave browser: https://github.com/brave/go-sync and it is open source but uses Amazon Cloud for their database backend storage.

Re:What's the deal with Chromium on Linux? Google at odds wi... by tracker1 on Wednesday January 27, 2021 @06:56PM (#25935920)
Cool... thanks, wasn't aware of this... guessing Opera may have done the same... in which case Google are just being kind of a-holes about it.