Re:Facebook Escalates Attack on Socialist Left
by jfengel on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @12:58PM
(#25919036)
The same left that cheered the removal of calls for violence, including ones sporting the threadbare figleaf of being about nonexistent election fraud -- yes, that one.
To the degree that these sites are calling for violence, I'm all for it. If that merely means the use of the word "revolution" often associated with socialism, honestly, it's time to get a new buzzword. It has become pathetic, in a "South Postpones Rising Again For Yet Another Year" fashion[1]. If they're serious about violent revolution, Facebook is well within their rights to remove it. If they're not, stop playing armchair revolutionary.
Facebook make it quite clear that shutting down right wing conspiracy theories was about the potential for violence. If that's the case for left-wing groups as well, they should say so, as a blanket statement if not on a case-by-case basis.
If they're doing it out of a sense of "balance", so that they can remove nonviolent groups of various sorts, that I oppose. Violence is a fairly bright-line concept and I've got no fear of it becoming a slippery slope. Conpsiracy theories tending to incite violence are less clear and more fraught, but January 6 demonstrated conclusively that it's a genuine and not merely theoretical issue.
To the degree that these sites are calling for violence, I'm all for it. If that merely means the use of the word "revolution" often associated with socialism, honestly, it's time to get a new buzzword. It has become pathetic, in a "South Postpones Rising Again For Yet Another Year" fashion[1]. If they're serious about violent revolution, Facebook is well within their rights to remove it. If they're not, stop playing armchair revolutionary.
Facebook make it quite clear that shutting down right wing conspiracy theories was about the potential for violence. If that's the case for left-wing groups as well, they should say so, as a blanket statement if not on a case-by-case basis.
If they're doing it out of a sense of "balance", so that they can remove nonviolent groups of various sorts, that I oppose. Violence is a fairly bright-line concept and I've got no fear of it becoming a slippery slope. Conpsiracy theories tending to incite violence are less clear and more fraught, but January 6 demonstrated conclusively that it's a genuine and not merely theoretical issue.
[1] https://www.theonion.com/south-postpones-rising-again-for-ye...