Re:Google won't donate to members of Congress who voted agai...
by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @10:31AM
(#25916903)
There were no objections entertained during 2000 election certification. Or at least, there was no sponsor in the senate, so no vote was taken.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google won't donate to members of Congress who voted agai...
by seniorThrowaway on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @10:38AM
(#25917006)
The statement was "Please name the Democrats who objected to the certification of the Electoral College votes in 2000 and 2004." I named one. Your response is irrelevant.
Re:Google won't donate to members of Congress who voted agai...
by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @10:50AM
(#25917160)
But the story is titled “ Google won't donate to members of Congress who voted against election results” and the comment, assuming it was made in good faith and wasn’t just there to troll, implied equivalence between the two topics.
Re:Google won't donate to members of Congress who voted agai...
by seniorThrowaway on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @11:16AM
(#25917528)
I think in that case your response should have been to the original comment, not mine. I was responding to a very specific instance of specious feigned ignorance.
Re:Google won't donate to members of Congress who voted agai...
by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday January 26, 2021 @04:12PM
(#25921120)
If someone moves the goal post in a comment and the next comment moves the goal post back, who is in the wrong?