After the pandemic hit the West - Europe started locking down mid-March, Trump banned EU flights on 12th - Germany (a democracy of 80 million people) passed a financial aid package on 23rd of March; US (a democracy of 300 million people) followed on the 25th.
So it's quite clear that democracies can react quickly, provided there's broad consensus of what the problem is and how to solve it; of course, things slow down when there's no consensus and conflicting views, but arguably that's a feature, not a bug.
It's also difficult to compare because autocracies are less likely to release data that makes them look bad (they're too busy building a 'strong collective identity').
But obviously different people have different preferences. I'm also young, fit, healthy programmer, so all-in-all very lucky.
I've wondered about this. Is there a way that democracy could compete, possibly by reflecting "the will of the people" quickly and accurately?
Or would that always fundamentally be a popularity contest?
Or will democracy require something akin to "martial law" to quickly decide and act on urgent matters?