Re:Do your job, land in jail and pay $1.5 million?
by metageek on Thursday May 26, 2011 @09:17PM
(#2590080)
There are more details in the interview tzs linked to [1].
>It was as though he thought his interpretation of policy superseded the authority of the people or office who/which set out the policy.
It's worse than that. According to the juror in the interview, there was no policy on who could get the passwords. So it wasn't a matter of interpretation; it was purely pulled out of his posterior data storage unit.
>It was as though he thought his interpretation of policy superseded the authority of the people or office who/which set out the policy.
It's worse than that. According to the juror in the interview, there was no policy on who could get the passwords. So it wasn't a matter of interpretation; it was purely pulled out of his posterior data storage unit.
[1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2588689