News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by wppick on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:22PM (#25875912)
How do you explain paywalls then?
Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by mumblemumble on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:28PM (#25875968)
The main reason I don't sign up for more paywalled things is not concerns about money, it's sheer inertia. Signing up takes effort, and it's yet another subscription to manage.

That extends to relatively low-friction cases like Patreon. The number of podcasters and bloggers where I've thought, quite earnestly, "I really like what this person is doing, I should kick a few quid their way," and then just not done that is near infinite. And it's never because I was feeling stingy; it's because I couldn't be arsed.

Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by dukeyukey on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:24PM (#25875943)
Paywalls typically ask you to get a subscription, not to pay for that particular article.
Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by davidkellis on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:23PM (#25875926)
Everyone hates paywalls
Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by wppick on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:26PM (#25875958)
Yes, because they want you to pay for a monthly or yearly subscription and you just want to read one article and maybe never come back to their site. But if I can do a 1-click "pay 1/2 cent" to read the rest of the article that would be totally fair
Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by GekkePrutser on Friday January 22, 2021 @03:30PM (#25875982)
That's not the only thing. It's the hassle as well.

First they want you to sign up for an account. Give a lot of personal data. Then set up a payment model, often recurring. Just to read one article? No way.

Micropayments will save some of that hassle but I don't want to have an account with every news site linked to by HN.

Re:Ask HN: Why aren't micropayments a thing? by PeterisP on Friday January 22, 2021 @09:34PM (#25879006)
If the alternative to a x% chance of upselling someoone to a yearly subscription is "read one article and maybe never come back to their site" then the price that the vendor will want to charge for that article is x% of that yearly subscription. You mention 1/2 a cent in multiple comments, but that's not a realistic expectation - if the paywalled sites would offer a per-article payment, they would definitely want to charge much more than that for that single article, closer to a dollar or so. They don't offer per-article pricing because the currently paywalled sites can earn more otherwise - the micropayment challenges aren't relevant, they will not sell their goods so cheaply (as it would devalue and 'cannibalize' their main revenue) even if there was a zero-fee micropayment mechanism.

Half a cent per article is a plausible target for all the weak/cheap sources who can't possibly afford to put up a paywall right now because nobody would pay. It's not going to be used by the currently paywalled sites, their business model relies on getting a not-micro amount from each customer.