Re:Judge refuses to reinstate Parler after Amazon shut it down
by jcranmer on Thursday January 21, 2021 @10:47PM
(#25868096)
For clarification: I'm detailing what Parler alleged as a fact (see ¶15 of the original Complaint for where Parler alleges this). My point is that if Parler's alleged facts are all true (which is not the same as saying they're all true!), that does not sustain its antitrust claims.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge refuses to reinstate Parler after Amazon shut it down
by mumblemumble on Thursday January 21, 2021 @10:51PM
(#25868114)
All fair, but I think it still bears calling out. Repeating a claim that's well-known to be bunk, and using the unqualified word "fact" to describe it, will sow a lot of confusion. Especially when discussing a case that already rests at the center of a great big gyre of misinformation and misconception.