It's a big club, and you ain't in it.
This is like saying that society wasn't ok with Trump when almost half voted for him.
Trying to rewrite history because there's a Ideological and political control of tech companies doesn't mean you're right.
The same goes for law. Just because something is legal or you don't win a case, it doesn't mean it's right or fair.
In my experience, rabid attitudes come up whenever you don't toe conventional lines regarding the good Vs the bad American parties.
You're not allowed to an opinion that's not the right one.
It's that the subjects of multiple anti-trust probes and companies known for on the down colluding in the past happened to be the ones pulling the plug.
You can argue it was "everyone" having a problem with it, but keep in mind that the Valley is not "everyone". That's the funny thing about conspiracies. Everyone whose in on it flatly denies it, even when it is obvious.
Not saying there was one mind. Just pointing out that assuming "management in the Valley" who have go/no-go on firing customers equates to "everyone" not being okay with it. It does not build confidence to many when unilateral decisions by execs shape the landscape for everyone else. Also yes, some of that population who aren't okay with that likely buy in to more conspirarial thought as well. Doesn't change the facts of the matter.
No conspiracy is needed. Same thing happens in neighborhoods - assholes tend to get a reputation as "the asshole neighbor" pretty rapidly. There doesn't have to be a neighborhood meeting to decide this; it just happens.