Re:Carl Sagan's questions for aliens. (1996)
by qndreoi on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @06:47PM
(#25853440)
Inertial confinement or magnetic confinement? Which is a dead end? Which is the more promising path forward in 2021? Why?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Carl Sagan's questions for aliens. (1996)
by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @07:06PM
(#25853601)
I'd rather ask someone "in contact with aliens" a math question, where we could check the answer, than a question about the direction of technology which 1) gives them a binary choice (easier to fake), and 2) could result in some labs burning years of time, even if they don't blow themselves up.
Re:Carl Sagan's questions for aliens. (1996)
by qndreoi on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @07:32PM
(#25853811)
Hence the last part of the question, "Why?"
I doubt even someone with a PhD in an unrelated field could bullshit the experts in fusion research.
Re:Carl Sagan's questions for aliens. (1996)
by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @07:52PM
(#25853965)
"Inertial. Magnetic will be more inefficient at higher power levels, because a particle you haven't discovered yet will dampen the reaction if you use magnetic confinement. Ultimately it's because the string coupling parameters for the 3rd-dimension/8th-dimension interaction are stronger than for the 5th-dimension/7th-dimension interaction". It's an explanation that looks like probable made-up baloney, but can you be sure? Can you (or anyone) disprove it?