Again on 0-based vs. 1-based indexing

Re:Again on 0-based vs. 1-based indexing by gjm11 on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @10:49AM (#25847808)

Back in the mid-to-late 20th century, there was a movement to teach mathematics rather that way, though I don't think it ever got as far as teaching small children the Peano axioms. The "New Mathematics", they called it. I remember encountering talk of sets and functions in UK primary school circa 1975.

It never worked very well in practice. I expect that when you're fortunate enough to have unusually able teachers teaching unusually able pupils it might do OK -- but then, in that situation, anything will do OK.

(Tom Lehrer fans will know about this from his song "New Math", with "It's so simple, so very simple, that only a child can do it" in the refrain.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Again on 0-based vs. 1-based indexing by cpcallen on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @05:34PM (#25852867)

For the record: Lehrer-style "new math" was what I was taught at elementary school in Ontario in the 1980s. I know it was not what my parents had been taught, because they couldn't understand how we did subtraction. We did do some other bases (mainly binary, as I recall) as well as modulus.

I certainly had unusually able teachers.

[ Parent | on HN ]