News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon: Not OK – Why we had to change Elastic licensing by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @09:15PM (#25841789)
I don’t see these as comparable. If Microsoft packaged up Linux and started selling Linux licenses, maybe? Elastic search being used in a product seems different from elastic search being the product. It’s not black and white, but there are real differences.
Re:Amazon: Not OK – Why we had to change Elastic licensing by tolmasky on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @03:28AM (#25843951)
I can’t imagine anything closer to “selling THE product” when it comes to Linux than AWS EC2. It’s Linux as a service on different virtual hardware options. It’s directly comparable to the AWS Elastic search service, which is Elastic search as a service on different virtual hardware options. The fact that this isn’t immediately obvious shows how much we take Linux for granted.

Perhaps you mean when comparing to the “all Silicon Valley companies” I mentioned, but that still leaves AWS, GCP, Azure, Heroku, and every serverless provider out there as direct comparisons to this situation.

Re:Amazon: Not OK – Why we had to change Elastic licensing by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @11:40AM (#25848511)
Ah yeah, I meant the comment about “literally every single company in Silicon Valley,” but now I see that was entirely ambiguous. I thought you meant like Facebook, google (minus GCP), Uber, Airbnb, etc profiting off of linux (and pandas and gcc and pytorch and Cpython and ...).