News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by krspykrm on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @06:02PM (#25840146)
Seconding this. Unless something's changed, my experience with the default Go daemon they provide was shock at how much resources it consumed in the background. It was something like 12% CPU usage while doing nothing at all for hours on end - I wasn't even accessing any ipfs content.
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by fabianhjr on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @06:18PM (#25840312)
I see less than 1% cpu usage and 200mb memory usage and 4% spikes while serving my personal website or fetching an IPFS resource.

(Though on a Linux system I also modified the low water setting up to 1000 peers and the high water setting to 2000 peers)

Re:IPFS Support in Brave by krspykrm on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @06:39PM (#25840511)
Yeah I just tried downloading the latest version and it looks much better now. I remember I tried ~3 years ago or so and it was horribly inefficient, so I deleted it, then gave it another shot around a year ago and came to the same conclusion.

But yes, from running it ~10 minutes just now, it looks quite reasonable.

Re:IPFS Support in Brave by StavrosK on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @08:31AM (#25846184)
Yeah, they did improve it recently (within the past year or so). I see that Brave uses a gateway by default, I guess that's good for adoption but bad for decentralization. Then again, users don't care about decentralization as much as they care about convenience, so that's a good first step.
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by Mandatum on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @12:43AM (#25842933)
12-32% on a Macbook Pro 2019.

I don't think I'm going to adopt this.