News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by jjd33 on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @04:10PM (#25838932)
Peter Thiel (Palantir) is one of their main investors. that should raise all alarm bellas for a product that advertises itself with "privacy"
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by BrendanEich on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @06:46PM (#25840586)
Peter Thiel is not personally an investor in Brave. The firm he's a partner in (Founders Fund) has a small seed series investment, which was led by Cyan Banister. Some first floor engineers at Brave have more equity than that small investment constitutes. Repeating falsehoods once you know they are false is lying, so please don't.
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by webmaven on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @06:54PM (#25840671)
> Some first floor engineers at Brave have more equity than that small investment constitutes.

Is "first floor engineers" an SV-ism (or Brave-ism) that indicates something like "early employees"?

Re:IPFS Support in Brave by BrendanEich on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @07:01PM (#25840743)
It's wider than SV, startup folks anywhere know it. Yes, early employees.
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by erichocean on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @04:54PM (#25839422)
Palantir exists to improve privacy of citizen data within the government. Without it, government workers have massive, untraceable and unaccountable access to private data. (See Snowden for more info.)

I don't like that there's even a need for Palantir, but given the need, I'm glad it exists and I'm glad someone like Thiel is behind it.

Re:IPFS Support in Brave by TameAntelope on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @05:42PM (#25839921)
I very, very much do not buy this at all.

I don't honestly care all that much about Palantir specifically (pros and cons, though lots of cons), but one thing they do not do by simply existing is help citizens protect their data. They do a lot of things, but not that.

That's just marketing/PR nonsense.

Re:IPFS Support in Brave by lasfter on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @05:40PM (#25839899)
Instead we give that access to Palantir workers? How is that any better?
Re:IPFS Support in Brave by webmaven on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @07:01PM (#25840744)
> Palantir exists to improve privacy of citizen data within the government.

Huh. So the argument to overcome objections to a

Re:IPFS Support in Brave by webmaven on Friday January 29, 2021 @01:11PM (#25960386)
Well, that's annoying. Here is what I meant to post, more or less:

Huh. So the argument to overcome objections to a system designed for ingesting, canonicalizing, normalizing, and correlating private data acquired via dubious means from dubious sources is that at least the access to and use of the data is controlled monitored and auditable, reducing the incidence of LOVEINT and similar abuses as compared to ad-hoc systems constructed on the sly?

That's really damning with faint praise, especially since Jevon's Paradox ensures that both the use AND abuse of such data will increase when you reduce the 'costs' of doing so, and that's assuming there is no unsanctioned/off-book/'black' use or egress of the data (which is far from assured, IMO, given what we know about the history of these systems and projects, eg. Total Information Awareness and Trailblazer vs. ThinThread).