Re:Amazon: Not OK – Why we had to change Elastic licensing
by StavrosK on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @11:36AM
(#25835181)
I agree, but I think it's generally "tweaking the rules so they can stay alive" at this point, ie not about increasing an already big revenue stream.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon: Not OK – Why we had to change Elastic licensing
by SpicyLemonZest on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @11:44AM
(#25835272)
That's certainly what it looks like Elastic is trying to imply, but their revenue was over $400 million last year.
Re:Amazon: Not OK – Why we had to change Elastic licensing
by toomuchtodo on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @12:40PM
(#25836125)
For comparison, AWS does about $40B/year in revenue.