Am I the only one who pictured the lab workers munching on 100M year old microbe colonies?
Or in laymens words: the half-life of a DNA molecule per nucleotide depends on the environment and is in the order of magnitude around 1 million years. Else, we would not have any ancient genomes by now.
DNA stabilizing:
Much lower T (below 0C) Practically no radiation (an ocean above you blocking it all)
DNA de-stabilizing: Corrosive chemicals spewing from a nearby volcano (but only if one is near you!) Radiation from said volcano and rocks (but they'd have to be closer still, due to shielding from the water)
So unless the 500 year half life is the "self-damaging" rate, I'd expect DNA at the bottom to last much longer.
It did say that there were microscopic amounts of oxygen in the sediment. Presumably, that was enough to maintain a minimally-small MR.
-- D’Hondt, S. et al. Presence of oxygen and aerobic communities from sea floor to basement in deep-sea sediments. Nature Geosci. 8, 299–304 (2015).
That will have caused selective pressure to manage to survive with so few resources. Those that can't simply become energy for others who can.
> But the real secret of their remarkable survival lies in their metabolic rate. It is just slow enough for them to survive for such long periods.
That would imply their metabolic rate to be practically zero, 101 million years is such a long time that even the tiniest amount of activity would result in a depletion of resources. Does that mean they die, only to come back to live at a better time?