Re:Julia adoption keeps climbing
by jakobnissen on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @01:50AM
(#25830714)
In that case, it's closer to C in speed, and usually more generic and "easy on the eyes". I don't know much about C, but seem to recall that it doesn't play well with unicode, usually treating text as bytes. Here's an equivalent Julia example:
This takes about 8.2 µs for a 8.5 Kb piece of text on my laptop, but that only works on ASCII text and only treats ' ' as whitespace, not e.g. '\n'. For a more generic one, you can do:
This is 20 µs for the same text, so still only 3 ns per char. The underlying functionality, namely String iteration and the `isspace` function, is also implemented in pure Julia.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.