Re:Apple acknowledges Mac Defender malware, promises update
by tptacek on Wednesday May 25, 2011 @11:27AM
(#2584287)
That's good, because nobody made that claim.
Re:Apple acknowledges Mac Defender malware, promises update
by drivebyacct2 on Wednesday May 25, 2011 @11:41AM
(#2584347)
Safer, more secure, what's the practical difference here? I'm tired of the implication that OS X is inherently more secure. I have yet to see anything to indicate that is true, especially when considering the, albeit still slow, growth of malware in OS X as market share has increased.
Honestly, for a user that is not using Internet Explorer, I can't imagine a workflow nearly as dangerous as is possible with Safari. It's not hard to be safe in Windows these days.
Re:Apple acknowledges Mac Defender malware, promises update
by tptacek on Wednesday May 25, 2011 @12:09PM
(#2584455)
This is the second time now you've "refuted" the argument that OS X is "more secure", which is interesting because nobody made that argument
A Food & Liquor on Chicago's West Side is more secure than a 7-11 in suburban Kennilworth. You have to pass your money through a little slot in a bulletproof glass window!
The 7-11 is safer. Nobody ever sticks it up.
This is not a complicated point.
I'm glad you're happy with Windows security. I'm pretty impressed with it too. But I'm biased, having worked with them professionally on it in the past.
Re:Apple acknowledges Mac Defender malware, promises update
by drivebyacct2 on Thursday May 26, 2011 @10:34PM
(#2590251)
Until 7-11s pop up all over town and become known for being notoriously easy to walk in and back out of with their money.
I don't really buy the claim that OS X is intrinsically more secure than Windows these days.