News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by AnthonyMouse on Sunday January 17, 2021 @11:42PM (#25818236)
> Lol, I love that quote ("your new society will end up consisting of approximately three principled civil libertarians and seven zillion witches"). It's very true, and not the least bit surprising.

It's not quite true though.

It's what happens when you're the new kid on the block and the incumbents are appointing Witchfinders General to burn the heretics, because then rather than languishing in obscurity as you would otherwise, you get a huge influx of refugees and thousands of them are witches. Then if you let the witches chase off all the other refugees, you reach the undesired end state.

The way around this is to get big enough that most of your users are not witches. So the incumbents can do it already. Just stop having witch hunts. The witches can't take over when all the witches in the whole world are 0.5% of your user base, and other people only leave once the witches take over. It's a stable equilibrium.

But you can also get there another way, which is when the incumbents are hunting witches so hard that 95% of their refugees are innocent people. Then you just sit there and let everybody in, and your percentage of actual witches isn't so high that you're in trouble.

Unless anybody who tries to do that gets canceled before they can get a large enough user base to outnumber the witches.

Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by notahacker on Monday January 18, 2021 @06:52AM (#25820810)
Let's follow that argument through to its logical conclusion. If the incumbents actually were hunting witches "so hard that 95% of their refugees were innocent people", the vast majority of the influx of refugees to new platforms would not be witches and they would not have to worry about getting a large user bases for witches to be vastly outnumbered.

Presumably this would be reflected in Gab, Voat and Parler being entirely normal discussion forums where people talking about storming capitols or Jewish problems would soon be shouted down by the majority userbase of perfectly normal people. Has this been the case?

Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by AnthonyMouse on Monday January 18, 2021 @12:04PM (#25823818)
> Has this been the case?

The only one of the three that reached the point of having enough users to plausibly get there was Parler, and they were forced offline almost immediately after that happened. On the basis of a list of misbehavior which was unlikely to have been representative.

They had 10 million users. I have a hard time believing that there are 10 million "insurrectionists" in the country and if there were we have bigger problems. Meanwhile the cherry picked examples weren't anything you couldn't also find on Twitter or Facebook.

Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by dmurray on Monday January 18, 2021 @05:39AM (#25820349)
People like witch hunts, though: that's the point. If a "big platform" was to get less witch-hunty, it would start to lose users.
Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by AnthonyMouse on Monday January 18, 2021 @12:15PM (#25823940)
Is there any example of this ever happening? A major platform losing a non-trivial proportion of their users for not censoring them?

The network effect is strong. That's the problem to begin with. If people would quit so easily then there would be a lot more platforms and competition and we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by CyberDildonics on Monday January 18, 2021 @07:26PM (#25828468)
slashdot is a cesspool and a wasteland now. It is dominated by ridiculous nonsense, bots, spam, ascii swastikas etc.
Re:Parler's home page is back online, but app still not in s... by AnthonyMouse on Monday January 18, 2021 @08:25PM (#25828886)
Since when was it not? It died for much the same reasons as Myspace, not for lack of censorship.

And Slashdot has a moderation system that hides that stuff.