Treating something or someone as infallible contradicts the basic principles of science.

So then you must agree, "Peer reviewers of Nature did a bad job" is a poor dismissal of their criticisms

That was my question; glad you saw it; it's still unanswered; providing testable evidence for a claim is another basic principle of science; if the article or the reviewers are wrong, the top commenter has to give them a chance to recognise that by providing evidence for review.

I'm not following your point anymore. I wish you would just explain your criticism instead of making these snarky comments.

What snarky comments? I asked a question. You even quoted it. There is no reason to become aggressive.

All your comments are snarky!

If you're polite and respectful to people, they respond better. Give it a try. :-)

And your comment could be taken as condescending. I don't see how that adds anything to the discussion.