js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read.

Re:js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read. by aboringusername on Sunday January 17, 2021 @03:10PM (#25814442)

What staggers me is when sites like Twitter decide that JS is now required to read a tweet...Like it's literally some text like what you read on HN but it needs damn JS...Why?! The entire website could work as a simple .txt file for all I care, no reason why it should be so bloated.

All sites like FB, Twitter should by law be required to work without JS at a minimum due to how important they are in our society today.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read. by progval on Sunday January 17, 2021 @05:01PM (#25815535)

Twitter's goal is explicitly to have a single codebase that works everywhere: desktop website, mobile website, and mobile apps. (Sorry I can't find a source for this, any search with the "twitter" keyword is flooded with irrelevant results...)

It makes sense in that context; but I agree it's a shame they won't keep a small alternative frontend just to view tweets.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read. by ryandrake on Monday January 18, 2021 @11:48AM (#25823599)

I think the point is: you don’t need a “codebase” to display text and images. Which is what the vast majority of web content is: text and images.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read. by shamas on Monday January 18, 2021 @07:25AM (#25821067)

Why? Why should you be in a position to dictate to twitter how to operate. It's a multi-million dollar company with many smart people working away on the product. Who are you? If you just want walls of text and a completely unengaging product, stick to hackernews.

[ Parent | on HN ]