Re:You're Using JSON, Why not MessagePack?
by longlistener on Tuesday May 24, 2011 @01:52PM
(#2580826)
If you are representing this on an HTML page you'd need to Base64 encode the bugger, adding a lot more overhead.
Honestly I'm not sure why you wouldn't just simply use gzipped/JSON. My test show nearly no difference (1-2%) in performance with MessagePack, yet you get to leverage all kinds of things that already understand JSON.
Honestly I'm not sure why you wouldn't just simply use gzipped/JSON. My test show nearly no difference (1-2%) in performance with MessagePack, yet you get to leverage all kinds of things that already understand JSON.