Licensing changes to Elasticsearch and Kibana

Re:Licensing changes to Elasticsearch and Kibana by shawnz on Friday January 15, 2021 @08:53AM (#25790933)

Well, the linked page indicated that copyleft is something that applies only to distribution and not use, but I guess the AGPL shows that that's not true.

Nonetheless I don't agree with the GNU's claim that copyleft doesn't reduce freedoms. Of course a permissive license provides more freedoms: it's right there in the name

But this issue isn't really about permissive vs copyleft licensing anyway: Had Apache used a copyleft license with Lucene, Elasticsearch would have never existed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Licensing changes to Elasticsearch and Kibana by zaarn on Friday January 15, 2021 @09:09AM (#25791073)

But Amazon is hardly offering Lucene as a SaaS offering, don't they?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Licensing changes to Elasticsearch and Kibana by shawnz on Friday January 15, 2021 @09:13AM (#25791119)

If they did, should that mean Elasticsearch can't?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Licensing changes to Elasticsearch and Kibana by zaarn on Friday January 15, 2021 @09:19AM (#25791191)

I don't see the point there.

Lucene is a library, you can hardly offer it as SaaS. It's gluework.

On the other hand, Elastic is much more enduser software, which is much more routinely abused for SaaS hosting by larger corporations.

[ Parent | on HN ]