Re:Apple reportedly dropped plan for encrypting backups afte...
by random5634 on Thursday January 14, 2021 @01:42PM
(#25780324)
AMP so obviously was better than ginormous ad filled sites that jank and jump like crazy it wasn't even funny. The idea that there was no user benefit was just a HN view - out in the real world plenty of people learned the lightening icon meant both faster and usually much cleaner and easier to browse.
I think in part a fair number of HN folks maybe do web dev work, and having google restrict the junk they can dump on users was annoying to them. A fair bit of the anti-trust rhetoric is not coming from consumers or consumer advocates but other businesses - some of which have just horribly seedy business models (the recommendation engine searching sites with all the auto-generated fake reviews complaining of de-prioritizations etc).
AMP was my favourite example. You could interpret AMP as Google ensuring a better experience for users, or as Google highjacking the web into a closed ecosystem to squeeze out competitors. HN threads about AMP almost always concluded that it was a terrible overreach by Google, anti-competitive, and bad for everyone. But an article suggesting that Apple maybe put the FBI ahead of users in this instance? Dismissed because OP is "inclined to believe."