News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You might not need jQuery (2014) by porker on Thursday January 14, 2021 @04:42AM (#25774243)
Assuming I'm going to need the complexity more than 1-2 times in my source code, I'm going to be writing my own abstraction. Which takes time, needs tests writing, and I am going to make a typo or other silly mistake somewhere.

Run into a couple of examples of such complexity, and the dependency is well worthwhile.

A jQuery that can be tree-shaken would be awesome, as there are parts I use regularly and others I have never used. Ironically the -lite bundle leaves outs parts I use frequently...

There are no comments on this comment yet.