That's an interesting take home from the article.
What I got from it was "We can create distributed social networks that are censorship resistant (this is a problem with technical solutions), but that isn't necessarily a good idea. Some form of decentralised moderation process is also needed (which is both a social and technical problem)."
>spammers, neo-nazis, and child pornographers (or any other type of content that you consider despicable)
>Wikipedia editors are predominantly white, male
>it may be appropriate to take into account the power relationships between the people involved, and hold the privileged and powerful to a higher standard than the oppressed and disadvantaged, since otherwise the system may end up reinforcing existing imbalances