> in the context of the comic it’s clearly meant to be interpreted that way.

That's just not true. The claim is that if you're censored and your only defense of your position is that you should be allowed to say it, you position is flimsy. Nobody would agree with the claim that "_in general_ if you're censored your speech is abhorrent", that's laughable.

Now, yeah, agreed, it's debatable whether this actually happens. But it sure feels like it happens.