News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A bit on scaling chess.com's database by matsemann on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:04PM (#25738017)
As a lichess player myself I have to say I find it a bit tone deaf and annoying that it's peddled in every context chess.com is mentioned.
Re:A bit on scaling chess.com's database by jka on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:47PM (#25738795)
Under that perspective I'm perhaps guilty of mentioning lichess unnecessarily, but I do think the site is an interesting phenomenon (i.e. providing cutting-edge technology, at no cost to users, without advertising or tracking).

Raising awareness of alternatives is good, but yep I think it's also fair to be critical of the way that awareness is generated.

Re:A bit on scaling chess.com's database by chongli on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @12:31AM (#25742700)
I think it’s entirely warranted, given that lichess does not have the budget to sponsor big name chess streamers. The only thing that keeps lichess going is the user base.
Re:A bit on scaling chess.com's database by nmfisher on Monday January 11, 2021 @08:01PM (#25740844)
I have a chess.com account and wouldn’t have heard about lichess if not for this post.
Re:A bit on scaling chess.com's database by oli5679 on Monday January 11, 2021 @07:45PM (#25740666)
I think it's an interesting phenomenon and worth spreading some info about, both because of the technical aspects and the philosophy of the creator I prefer.

I do the same in person with friends, and if they ignore me, or try it and prefer chess.com then not too much harm done:).

Re:A bit on scaling chess.com's database by newen on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:24PM (#25738377)
It’s because lichess is pretty significantly better than chess.com while being free. Creates that extra motivation to make that post.