News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Isn’t Telegram End-to-End Encrypted by Default (2017). Parent comment

Re:Why Isn’t Telegram End-to-End Encrypted by Default (2017) by hiq on Monday January 11, 2021 @04:48PM (#25737777)
> This drops Signal out which has a limit of 150 on groups

Your own link mentions "Size limit of 1000", where did you see 150?

To be fair that's for new groups, maybe the limit used to be lower. Or do you mean that in practice it's not usable beyond 150 people?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Isn’t Telegram End-to-End Encrypted by Default (2017) by tulir on Monday January 11, 2021 @08:37PM (#25741160)
The page seems to have been updated recently to say 1000 instead of 150, definitely less than a month based on archive.org
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Isn’t Telegram End-to-End Encrypted by Default (2017) by pmlnr on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @02:30AM (#25743515)
3 days ago it was 150, I swear.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Isn’t Telegram End-to-End Encrypted by Default (2017) by hiq on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @04:07AM (#25744176)
Well, it seems to be time to revisit your decision then!
[ Parent | on HN ]