Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
by koheripbal on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:02PM
(#25737984)
> I also understood the anger last summer and found it difficult to condemn it
No degree of injustice gives people ethical license to destroy the livelihoods of people who had no role in said injustices.
I found the media silence on the violence and destruction over the summer, as a means to further their political objectives, absolutely repugnant.
I equally condemn the Capitol Hill rioters and hope they all face long prison sentences.
Do not allow violence to be partisan. Whether it's attempting to burn down a courthouse in Portland, or trashing the capital building, laws and gov't are all that keep civilization together.
Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel
by TheGRS on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @02:21PM
(#25837575)
There was no silence around it. The images were shown very readily and commented on openly. "Silence" apparently is a very squishy term, the media showed images of violence and unrest during the summer just as much as they did with the capitol siege.
To be clear I don't ever want to see guns or explosives at a protest, nor do I want to see riots, but I also understood the anger last summer and found it difficult to condemn it when the people most affected were at their wit's end. I get the sense that last week's protestors were in a similar mindset, but their reasoning was highly flawed and easily debunked.
I'm sure anyone coming at this from a different perspective would see my view as hypocritical and I recognize that, but there's a feeling in my heart I can't shake about what happened last summer when it came to police brutality, one that can't easily be broken by a whataboutism.