Your reply edit implies you don't know what tortious means...

I said: > I mean in your mind I guess it's ok to make a comment that just states the word nig**r over and over because it's not tortious right?

You reply: > If Parler feels this is amounts to Civil Tort they will remove it.

I literally explained how it is not tortious. Regardless of jurisdiction. It's not defamation. It's not tortious. It's not a civil tort.

So you're admitting Parler won't remove a comment that's just "nig**r" repeated over and over according to their guidelines.

Thanks for making my point again.*