You just demonstrated that you didn't read (or understand?) the paper and once again made my point for me, so thanks:

The article is saying is that in the process of hate speech someone could commit something like defamation...

Parler says they won't be a tool for tortious conduct right?

_The literal article you linked is explaining how some courts have found calling someone a nig**r is not defamation_

And more importantly... if no specific person or action against a group was mentioned then the entire article doesn't even apply!

There are _so many deeply hateful things one can say without exposing themselves to a tort_

I mean in your mind I guess it's ok to make a comment that just states the word nig**r over and over because it's not tortious right?

Because Parler's guidelines are saying since it's not tortious they wouldn't deplatform the user!