News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Energy Vault – Gravitational Batteries by londons_explore on Monday January 11, 2021 @04:41AM (#25726695)
But each weight can be reused almost infinitely... The cost doesn't matter too much.
Re:Energy Vault – Gravitational Batteries by ktpsns on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:03AM (#25726847)
That's not right. Refinforced concrete will suffer from environmental influences and have a durability from maybe 30 years. That means you have a cost overhead of 3-4% per year for the replacement value.

Water tanks certainly have a much worse life time, given that they will start lacking after a short time and you don't only have to repair the tanks but also provide liquid to refill.

Re:Energy Vault – Gravitational Batteries by Retric on Monday January 11, 2021 @07:07AM (#25727843)
Cycling stress like that is going to dramatically reduce the lifespan due to tress fractures. I think they would be lucky to get 10-20 years from the blocks.

Stress fracture are already a significant issue for concrete dams when you frequently vary the water levels, and this is much worse as different stacking is going to stress each block slightly differently every time. In theory they might be perfectly flat surfaces meeting evenly, but in practice that’s far from the case.

Re:Energy Vault – Gravitational Batteries by leonletto on Monday January 11, 2021 @11:51AM (#25731605)
Wouldn’t you just grind them up and recycle them?
Re:Energy Vault – Gravitational Batteries by Retric on Monday January 11, 2021 @02:49PM (#25735309)
They can’t recycle it into blocks of the same material properties. It’s not worthless by any stretch, just a poor fit for such demanding applications.