News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by kingofpandora on Monday January 11, 2021 @12:54AM (#25725133)
So ... They are biased but not lying?
[dead]
Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by antonvs on Monday January 11, 2021 @02:05AM (#25725655)
I'm confused about what you're talking about.

The Mueller Report didn't "find nothing." If you're unaware of this, you can read about it here: https://www.commoncause.org/resource/read-the-mueller-report...

It only didn't end in legal action against Trump because of the procedural issues related to bringing charges against a sitting president. Barr made that decision, and chose to protect Trump.

Your video (apparently) shows a CNN producer who apparently believed the story was "fake", but that's not consistent with the actual facts we know.

Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by raxxorrax on Monday January 11, 2021 @04:45AM (#25726731)
I didn't find anything. I did show that Trump is surprisingly clean. Maybe because of lacking ability, but unusually clean for a president. Cleaner than Biden in case of Ukraine for example, even if Trumps dealings are self-serving.

Furthermore Bidens dealings are relevant to the US geopolitical ambitions and the censorship of it was a disgrace for the press. It keeps people uninformed, even if presentation of these issues is difficult for any news network.

Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by nindalf on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:54AM (#25727227)
> but unusually clean for a president

What's the standard here? Reagan arming Contra rebels by selling arms to Iran?

Or are you comparing to the presidential campaigns for President? Are you claiming that Obama and Romney and Clinton colluded way more with foreign powers?

Or are you comparing with Biden, who profited in no way from his dealings in Ukraine?

Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by raxxorrax on Monday January 11, 2021 @12:56PM (#25732857)
If there was a way to indict executive overreach on issues like surveillance and propaganda for example, things that are actually important compared to utterances of certain persons, the numbers would look quite different.

Trump is as guilty of executive overreach, no questions asked, but the criticism is very selective.

Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by pmiller2 on Monday January 11, 2021 @05:59AM (#25727264)
Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by raxxorrax on Monday January 11, 2021 @07:00AM (#25727794)
politfact is not really a good source. Trump has some financial involvements that should be questioned, but this isn't really enough. Indictment doesn't mean guilty as I believe.

If there had been something, we would have heard about it non-stop.

Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by pmiller2 on Monday January 11, 2021 @07:45AM (#25728161)
Well, Trump had 6 key people indicted, including his lawyer and his campaign manager, on 81 charges and several convictions / guilty pleas. Clinton had 2 indictments and 1 conviction, while Obama and Carter had 0. Which administration out of these would you say was the least "clean"?
Re:YouTube bans Steve Bannon's podcast channel by craftinator on Monday January 11, 2021 @02:49AM (#25725955)
You are very confused about the findings of the Mueller Report.